276°
Posted 20 hours ago

Celestron 71404 TrailSeeker 8x42mm Roof Binoculars with Dielectric-Coated Lens, BaK-4 Prism Glass, Lightweight Magnesium Alloy Body and Soft Carry Case, Black

£68.495£136.99Clearance
ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
ZTS2023
Joined in 2023
82
63

About this deal

For an 8x42 this is very good and therefore makes these Celestron binoculars perfectly suitable if you also like to study things like Butterflies and other Insects.

CELESTRON TRAILSEEKER 8x42 vs. NIKON MONARCH 7 8x42 - BirdForum CELESTRON TRAILSEEKER 8x42 vs. NIKON MONARCH 7 8x42 - BirdForum

com's Editor's Choice award for Best Medium Binoculars for Astronomy way back in 2014, thanks to their affordability and versatility. While the Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 performs relatively well and doesn't cost all that much in the grand scheme of things, other models cost the same and offer noticeably better performance.This means you can use them confidently in all weather conditions, whether you're indoors or outdoors, making them particularly handy for stargazing. Then if it is fast-moving and erratic in its movements (again something like a bird), a wide view makes it much easier to follow.

Vortex Diamondback HD 8x42 Review | Tested by GearLab Vortex Diamondback HD 8x42 Review | Tested by GearLab

But if you need something more specific check out the best compact binoculars guide for something smaller or our best binoculars for kids page. The manufacturer-stated field of view of 426 feet at 1000 yards is one of the best in its class, however, in testing conditions we recorded a measurement of 373 feet.

These small binoculars offer a 7x magnification and a sizable 50mm objective lens, striking a good balance between size and light-gathering ability.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment