The Spanking Machine: a collection of spanking stories

Product Information

However, the following video clip is either of the same machine or something more or less identical, and gives a clearer impression of the mechanism:

Machine Welcome to S M - Spanker Machine

The patent for this was granted to Ulysses DeMoulin on May 4, 1909 and can be viewed in full on the patents section of Google (see patents 654,611 and 920,837). In the abstract for the original application the device was described as follows: This machine for paddling soldiers who fail to shoot properly was featured in the US edition of Popular Mechanics during World War II. I have been spanked to the point of impact abrasions from paddles/brushes so when I say this thing hits hard you can guarantee anyone they would not be disappointed. I have also been thinking about ways to make this thing sturdy without having a work desk like I do, maybe a 2 4x4 vertical secured to something you would stand on to provide the same sturdiness.

Yvette and her online switchy boyfriend take their relationship a stage further when he buys a special spanking machine, which can be controlled remotely. It spanks him with wood and leather paddles as Yvette watches on webcam. Holding Arm/Base– It comes with a clamp and an arm that you attached the spanking machine to. The clamp should be attached to something sturdy and tight enough so that won’t slip, and the spanking machine can be rotated in the arm, in almost any position. This can accommodate the bent over position, the butt over a pillow position, or a laying flat on the bed position. Very versatile and pretty easy to set up. Implement Holder– The implement holder on the side, where you clamp your spanking implements into. The width available to put an implement in, was a little smaller than I would have wanted. When I tried to put a Lexan cane in there, it wouldn’t fit because of the foam/rubber handle on the cane was a little wider in girth, than the opening of the clamp area. But I was able to remove the handle on the cane, and then the cane fit in quite easily. I had trouble with the heavier implements especially causing the machine to work it’s way loose. I was using a rubber placemat, but I think a few layers of gripping material like they show in the instruction video is going to be important to have. I also couldn’t get all of the screws tightened completely so the machine moved a little too much. I thought it was supposed to come with a mini screwdriver, but did not and the smallest one I had on hand wasn't quite small enough.

Spanker Machine Review - General Spanking Discussion - Spanking Needs Spanker Machine Review - General Spanking Discussion - Spanking

This is in a picture agency's library but I have not been able to find out where it originally came from or what it is precisely. From the clothes of the boy being disciplined, it might be 1930s or 1940s but that is only a guess. The machine appears real, but it is hard to see from this picture quite how it works. One can make out what appears to be a small wooden paddle. The utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was one of the first writers to contemplate the possibility that corporal punishment might be administered by a machine rather than by a human being. In The Rationale of Punishment he wrote: I have bought the Spanker Machine from Spain. The first one lasted a year before the metal broke, but the new version was 20% stronger. But for the most part, most implements can't be used hard enough. The canes are the best ones to use, along with a thin bamboo paddle. Any heavier paddle drags down the machine, and straps and belts don't work properly with it. It's still better than nothing, but a stronger machine is needed to get to the severity desired. Song Koy had witnessed the punishment of six boys at his school, and felt it was "unfair when his friend, being the first to be caned, received the hardest strikes ... The discipline master (DM) was tired by the time he caned the last offenders, therefore his strike is lighter in comparison". (This is, in part, the argument put forward by Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century in the quote at the beginning of this article.)This video clip shows the inventor of a paddling machine testing his prototype on himself. The design is based on paddles that operate by gravity, which does not look to me as if it provides sufficient force to inflict a proper punishment. Rubber Spatula- This was completely useless regardless of the setting! It would not stay in the coupling. Maybe if the handle were more flat it would work well. I gave up and put it away. I can guarantee this design would be more than satisfactory, and if you wanted to make it even stronger you could add more springs. I plan to write up a full guide within a week or two of building this thing from start to finish. The following contrivance would, in a measure, obviate this inconvenience:-- A machine might be made, which should put in motion certain elastic rods of cane or whalebone, the number and size of which might be determined by the law: the body of the delinquent might be subjected to the strokes of these rods, and the force and rapidity with which they should be applied, might be prescribed by the Judge: thus everything which is arbitrary might be removed. A public officer, of more responsible character than the common executioner, might preside over the infliction of the punishment; and when there were many delinquents to be punished, his time might be saved, and the terror of the scene heightened, without increasing the actual suffering, by increasing the number of the machines, and subjecting all the offenders to punishment at the same time." The mounting is not as solid as I’d like, but given the objectives of the device manufacturer that’s not terribly surprising. This will also be something I will be looking at improving (and adding some features around) in the future (pile of parts en route from Banggood currently). The good