Professor PUZZLE Moral Conflict

Product Information

Find out who’s the goody-two-shoes and whose antics deserve a time-out in this hilarious family-friendly game of “Most likely to”! Furthermore, we did not explicitly control for socially desirable responding in our surveys. Nevertheless, we tried to keep the potential impact of social desirability as low as possible by ensuring strict anonymity to all our participants. Moreover, we excluded all items with extremely high percentages of altruistic decisions. For the remaining items, we observed statistical variance both within participants and across items, which probably speaks against highly socially desirable responding. FeldmanHall O, Mobbs D, Evans D, Hiscox L, Navrady L, Dalgleish T. What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition. 2012; 123: 434–441. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001 In the final version, the items 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 20 (socially close protagonists) and 24, 26, 27, 30, 31, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40 (socially distant protagonists) were assigned to set A; the items 1, 3, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19 (socially close protagonists) and 21, 22, 23, 25, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 36 (socially distant protagonists) became part of set B (see last column in S1 Table). Scruples inspires hours of stimulating conversation and laughter. Get to know people in unexpected ways.

New maps of development: new visions of maturity. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1982; 52: 199–212. 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb02682.x S2 Table shows the item statistics and results of Rasch model analyses on single item basis for the final 40 items of the EMCS Scale. If you’re only interested in receiving the newest games this is the box for you; guaranteeing only the latest games! Buy New Releases Box » Hofmann W, Wisneski DC, Brandt MJ, Skitka LJ. Morality in everyday life. Science. 2014; 345: 1340–1343. 10.1126/science.1251560 Singer N, Sommer M, Döhnel K, Zänkert S, Wüst S, Kudielka BM. Acute psychosocial stress and everyday moral decision-making in young healthy men: the impact of cortisol. Horm Behav. 2017; 93: 72–81. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.002For humans and most animals, the social interaction with conspecifics is a common everyday life activity [ 1]. Thereby, we humans are often confronted with morally conflicting social interaction situations. According to Christensen and colleagues [ 2], moral conflicts are situations in which someone is pulled in contrary directions by rival moral reasons. They can, amongst others, occur when deciding between a personal interest versus an accepted moral value. The game was conceived when the inventor was researching an article about baby boomer morality. He gave a questionnaire to a group of friends who spent the whole evening discussing the questions. It was so much fun, someone said, “This ought to be a game.” And the rest is history. S2 File: SPSS data of Studies 1 and 3. Based on this data set ( n = 150), we developed the two parallelized item sets for future use in within-subjects design studies and assessed the test and measurement properties of the EMCS Scale.

Kahane G, Everett JA, Earp BD, Farias M, Savulescu J. 'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition. 2015; 134: 193–209. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005 Jones B, Rachlin H. Social discounting. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17: 283–286. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01699.x Social discounting involves modulation of neural value signals by temporoparietal junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: 1619–1624. 10.1073/pnas.1414715112 I want to sell my old car. I know that the car’s radiator actually needs to be exchanged urgently. A man who does not notice the problem with the radiator offers to pay a good price in cash right away. What do I do?Find out who’s the goody-two-shoes and whose antics deserve a time-out in this hilarious family-friendly game of most likely to!