Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Just because a notion is attractive and might on the face of it seem plausible (to you) does not make it true and certainly does not mean that you should accept it without considering alternatives. regression to the mean – people tend to seek treatment when they feel particularly bad; chances are that things get better from then on, also without treatment What is the nature of this ‘biofield’? Is it an electromagnetic field? Is is a quantum field? Yes, pseudoscience adherents sprinkle the word ‘quantum’ liberally throughout their incomprehensible ‘explanations’, but real physicists with real insight in quantum physics are not impressed at all, and relegate this gibberish to the realm of fiction. So far, nobody has been able to give a satisfactory description of what a biofield actually is.
Just because science cannot prove it exists does not mean it does not. What science HAS proven is that we see an extremely small amount of color, hear a small range of sounds (also proven by the dog whistle that humans cannot hear but dogs can) and the brain is limited in what it can perceive in the world. Why is it that people that call themselves scientists cannot even allow for ALL possibilities rather than only those that can be witnessed? Until that stops, our global society is going to remain in a modern version of the dark ages in my opinion. I have honestly changed my views slightly to the idea of all of this. I use the word slightly as let’s hope for the best and give it a few more sessions. In all honestly I can’t say I can remember any such strong positive changes from any conventional or unconventional medicine or other in such a short period of time. Weird is the word. I don’t know what biology you have studied or where, but from your short communication, it almost seems like you may have missed about a centuries worth, or so, of research and accumulated biological and physical knowledge? Somehow, I am not totally convinced that, as you say “all healing practices ” work through the use of “frequencies”. Really? So if I understood your statement and logic correctly, conditions like salmonella i Sonic Heroes Puzzle (2004) · Sonic Mega Collection Plus Mini (2004) · Sonic the Hedgehog (2004) · Shadow the Hedgehog Flash (2005) · Sonic the Hedgehog CHAOS CRUSH! (2006) · Sonic Rivals Dash (2006) · Sonic Maze Craze (2007) Sonic Rush Adventure Flash (2007) · Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood (2008)Edzard. Not fallacies just misplaced scaffolding! Galileo did not invent the telescope rather iteratively refined it for his advanced stargazing and brought his new refinements it to their fullest expression during his time and thus invented its modern, fullest usage for our purposes.
Your link is to an INDEXING service, which is hosted by the National Institutes of Health and ultmately by the US Government, but that does not mean that they are responsible for the paper that you reference nor that they endorse it in any way. Use a soft-bristle toothbrush to clean divots and interiors. Lay upright on a dry paper towel to allow water droplets to depart from crevices.You must be aware who your (future) customers are (will be): they are affluent, had a decent education (evidently without much success), and are middle-aged, gullible and deeply alternative. Think of Prince Charles! Once you have empathised with this mind-set, it is obvious that you can profitably plug into the persecution complex which haunts these people.
The visible spectrum is the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that is visible to the human eye. Electromagnetic radiation in this range of wavelengths is called visible light or simply light. A typical human eye will respond to wavelengths from about 380 to about 750 nanometers. DNA adducts are segments of DNA that bind to specific chemicals, some of which are known carcinogens. This means that they can be used experimentally as markers for exposure. This is not the same as alterations to health, nor do they identify a pre-cancerous state. I would regard a pre-cancerous state as meaning that the cancer is already there, but is not yet large enough to be diagnosed. Most cancers are undetectable unless there are enough cancer cells present together in one place to produce a small lump (something like a small mole or pimple that you wouldn’t necessarily notice on your skin – on a scan this might show as a small non-specific cyst or nodule) this is about a billion cells (1,000,000,000). By this time the cancer has been present for long enough to have double roughly 30 times from the initial transformed cell. In practice this is years or often decades, which is one reason why not many cancers are found in young people. Since most cancers are fatal by the time they reach a trillion cells (1,000,000,000,000), which is only another 10 doublings, what we know as cancer only represents quite a late phase of the process. With all this science – sorry, pseudo-science – you must not forget to remain firmly grounded in tradition. Your treatment ought to be based on ancient wisdom which you have rediscovered, modified and perfected. I recommend mentioning that some of the oldest cultures of the planet have already been aware of the main pillars on which your invention today proudly stands. Anything that is that old has stood the test of time which is to say, your treatment is both effective and safe. But you get the gist, I am sure, and will be able to invent something. When you do, give it a memorable name, the name can make or break your new venture.I arranged a meeting where I realised her naturally inquisitive nature, studies and qualifications were good. Food science is her subject but turns out she also has qualifications in energy healing, reiki primarily. I tried to keep an open mind and asked her to show me. To be honest I don’t think any reiki was actually done but who knows as I was as sceptical as you about these type of events. I’m not sure the difference between these type of treatments but I did notice some weird nerve transitions when touching areas on my feet in some sort of ‘healing’ session. Truthfully, some adjustments to the way Sonic controls will need to be changed rather drastically for a difference to be felt. It isn't so detailed that even a minute change could make a difference, but this is for the best as the aim is to make players comfortable rather than leave them fiddling with the settings to make sure Sonic feels just right down to the very last detail. Some sliders being turned in different directions cause more drastic changes, however, and fans should understand that messing with things such as Sonic's turning speed and not his overall initial speed may lead to some awkward disconnects with the pacing. However, no matter how players make Sonic operate, every task in the game can be accomplished just fine on any and all speed settings. This includes even the most strict of S Rank times in the Cyber Space levels. How is this ‘biofield’ related to a person’s health? Even if a biofield would actually exist, this does not necessarily mean that it is in any way related to the state of health of a person. For comparison: every person has a property called ‘weight’ (or more precisely: mass), but barring extreme obesity or emaciation, someone’s weight says nothing in particular about their health. I followed your link and read the article. They make the very good point that reporting relative risk rather than absolute risk can be very misleading. They give the example of a hypothetical drug to prevent death from heart disease which reduces the risk from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 2,000. If you call this a 50% reduction in the risk of death, then people might think that it was worthwhile. On the other hand if you frame it that 2,000 people have to take the drug for one of them to benefit, then a lot of people might not bother. To clean your Biofield Tuning forks, we recommend using warm soapy water (hand or dish detergent work equally well).
If you want to know about electricity, magenetism and biology you could enrol in a biophysics course. You could start by reading about the seminal work of Alan Hodgkin (head of my college when I was an undergraduate) and Andrew Huxley in the 1930’s on the nature of the nerve impulse, for which they won a Nobel Prize in 1963. Once you understand how they used microelectrodes and voltage clamps to measure the flow of sodium and potassium ions across cell membranes, and following on from that the discovery of resting and action potentials, voltage-triggered ion channels, glucose-powered ion pumps etc. perhaps you will realise that physiology is more complicated than simply waving a tuning fork around, and in the process you may get some insight into the true beauty of life. First of all, many of them are designed to obtain a specific study group, patients that are more likely to meet the endpoints. Beyond that, the studies in some cases are open to interpretation, and data categorized in ways to show maximum benefit. Did I mention that sometimes safety data is not revealed ? Over-charging is your best chance of getting famous – or have you ever heard of a charlatan famous for being reasonably priced? It will also get rid of the riff-raff you don’t want to see in your surgery. Poor people might be even ill! No, you don’t want them; you want the ‘worried rich and well’ who can afford to see a real doctor when things should go wrong. But most importantly, high fees will do a lot of good to your bank account. We need a consciousness telescope that hopefully will not take a 100 years to convince people to look through to be convinced like Galileo had to endure.OK, I’ve followed your link and read the paper by Rubik et al. It mixes established science with religious history and New Age claptrap without distinguishing between them or providing any convincing evidence. The links to some of the references are dead-ends (I’m not going to the trouble of having a library chase up print-only journals) and others are exploratory studies. Yet others reference out-of-date ideas about embryonic development. How can one consistently observe the existence of this ‘biofield’? So far, nobody has been able to set up an experiment by which an arbitrary person can observe the existence of a biofield. Natural energy internal healing mechanisms being activated and released into my bloodstream via simple bioenergetic and biochemical responses to the stimulation of the baroreceptors around my heart and lungs and the Vagus nerve. The simple act of deep breathing and visualization stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system and natural immune functions- no doctors needed. If you would like to experience it I can perform biofield tuning over the telephone or over the phone on a patient who agrees to be treated in this way.
Great Deal 
New Comment