Mating: A Novel (Vintage International)

Product Information

A complex and moving love story... breathtaking in its cunningly intertwined intellectual sweep and brio Joy - There are times when our female anthropologist surprises herself on all the positive feelings her life contains. "Anther sign of being in equilibrium must be repeated feelings of equanimity about things that would normally bother you." Throughout Nar's odyssey in Tasu I kept wondering if she is the type of woman who wants a man or who needs a man. One of the abiding questions readers can pose. Oh, yes, when it comes to a combination of intellect and good looks, Nar tells us flatly, "My preference is always for hanging out with the finalists." Among the finalists she recounts there was burly Brit photographer Giles but, alas, similar to the other men in her life, gentleman Giles turned out to possess way too many flaws.

How can Norman Rush's 1991 Mating rank among the great 20th-century novels? Let me count the ways. With all respect to Emma Bovary, Anna Karenina, Isabel Archer, no modern male has imagined a female protagonist as vivid and complex as Mating's unnamed lover-anthropologist-adventurer. Few if any white novelists have written so easily about the underrepresented turf of Africa What is the Best Work of American Fiction of the Last 25 Years?". www.newyorktimes.com . Retrieved 2 March 2016. Exhilarating…vigorous and luminous…Few books evoke the state of love at its apogee.” –The New York Times Book ReviewBruns” anchored Rush’s 1986 collection, Whites, which featured six stories set in Botswana and was shortlisted for the Pulitzer Prize. Perhaps the praise it received—from Nadine Gordimer, Alice Munro, Joyce Carol Oates and Leslie Marmon Silko, among others—gave Rush the confidence he needed to compose a long novel entirely in the voice of the young anthropologist from “Bruns.” “Hubris made me do it,” he told the New York Times Book Review in 1991. “I know it sounds absurd, but I wanted to create the most fully realized female character in the English language.” Mating” is a novel for people who particularly love novels. It is also a calling card exchanged between romantic partners aspiring to the kind of courtship that occurs between Rush’s two main characters. In an early chapter, the narrator announces that she will not settle for the “usual form that mating takes,” in which women make themselves subservient to men and men try to get away with giving women as little attention as possible. Rush's third novel, Subtle Bodies, was published in September 2013. [7] [8] Published works [ edit ] Weeks, Sheldon (First Quarter 1993). "A Disappointing Novel". Africa Today. Indiana University Press. 40 (1): 78–79. JSTOR 4186892. The best rendering of erotic politics…since D.H. Lawrence…a marvelous novel, one in which a resolutely independent voice claims new imaginative territory…The voice of Rush’s narrator is immediate, instructive and endearing.” –The New York Review of Books

But he's elusive, difficult to find and approach -- and then, she realizes, likely to be difficult to hook. Writer Lauren Oyler said she read it on the recommendation of critic Christian Lorentzen, who gave her a beat-up copy a few years ago. Other recent converts include Blair Beusman, a social media editor at The New Yorker, and Sophie Haigney, the web editor at The Paris Review and a freelance writer, who said she counted the book among those like Shirley Hazzard’s “Transit of Venus” or Nancy Lemann’s “Lives of the Saints,” which are part of a “network of recommendations and rediscovery” online and in group texts. It was me and a group of true strangers talking about books we liked,” said Champagne, 35, who lives in the New York City borough of Queens and works at a startup. A woman recommended the novel without giving anyone in the chat room much to go on. “She was just straight up like, ‘This is the best book I’ve ever read,’” Champagne recalled.

More good mail days.

Even readers who remember the luminous stories in Rush's debut, Whites, may not be prepared for the cleverness, humor, insight into human nature and intellectual acuity demonstrated in this accomplished novel Young women’s affinity with “Mating” might also have to do with Rush’s female narrator, through whom he gives voice to his thoughts on love, sex, feminism, the infrastructure of Denoon’s experimental all-woman society and just about every other topic under the sun.

Norman Rush was born and raised in the San Francisco area, and graduated from Swarthmore College in 1956. He has been an antiquarian book dealer, a college instructor, and, with his wife, Elsa, lived and worked in Africa from 1978 to 1983. His first book, Whites, a collection of stories, was published in 1986. Mating is his first novel. It was awarded the National Book Award for fiction. Suggested Reading Set in Botswana in the early 1980s, Mating is narrated by an American graduate student in anthropology who feels a compulsion to “tell everything,” to record everything that happens to her. The result is a sprawling, complex, confessional narrative that explores the equally extraordinary inner lives and outer circumstances of its two main characters, the narrator and the man she falls in love with, Nelson Denoon. Denoon is a scourge and star academic, the author of the classic Development as the Death of Villages, who is now working on a utopian experiment: a solar-powered, egalitarian, matriarchal village deep in the Kalahari. When the narrator sets off alone across the desert to find Denoon and his highly secretive project in Tsau, she enters a world unlike any she has experienced before and finds a man more complicated and more intellectually challenging than any she has ever known. NEW YORK, NY .- Katherine Champagne had never heard of “Mating,” the award-winning novel by Norman Rush, until one afternoon in 2020, when she popped into a random room on Clubhouse in the early days of that social media app. There is an intriguing psychological component, where questions arise as to the reason Nelson wants to remain in Tsau. This part gets into philosophy, such as that of the Tao Te Ching, and transformations caused by near-death experiences. Is the change real or fabricated? This novel is one of the most unusual I have read. It is a novel of ideas and philosophy. It explores intimacy, love, history, politics, economics, feminism, and justice. It is a little drawn out in the beginning, recounting several of the protagonist’s relationships in Gabarone, but once she starts her trek across the Kalahari, it is entirely engrossing. She is searching for the “ideal” romantic relationship. The narrative is filled with intellectual sparring and literary references. Topics include commune life, capitalism, socialism, Marxism, apartheid, and the geopolitics of southern Africa. As an added bonus, it is guaranteed to expand the reader’s vocabulary, even if it is already vast.

Tsau is entered through an archway on a road that continues up a koppie, or stone hill, with a community of two hundred thatched homesteads spread around the slope. A small airstrip affords a place for a mail plane to land every two weeks. A striking feature of Tsau is the presence everywhere of glinting glass ornaments and mirrors. The inhabitants are mostly destitute women, two-thirds of them past childbearing age, about 450 people all told, including forty children and no more than fifty male relatives. The charter women own the property, which is passed down to female relatives and other women. Denoon lives on the hilltop in a concrete octagon. Like the women, he has lived with no mate; for that reason, his previous acquaintance with the narrator must not be disclosed, as it would suggest he was bringing in a companion denied the others. A delegation agrees to the narrator’s temporary residence, and after she has proven herself, she eventually moves in with Denoon. This is the story of a cerebral, overanalyzing woman who doesn’t want the mediocre or the nearly-great and sets her eyes on the one great man that she finds. She’s an anthropology student, working in Botswana on a failed dissertation. He’s an overachieving and well-known intellectual who’s running an experimental matriarchal-utopi Newsweek reviewer David Gates, on the other hand, is not so captivated by the narrator. He says that the novel "is state-of-the-art artifice: she [the narrator] talks, she introspects, she even suffers. But she never quite comes to life. Maybe that's the point—we are talking narcissism—but despite the work that went into her, we can't take her to heart." [7]

Mating shouldn't work on any level. A first person narrative about a young failing female anthropologist falling in love with an older American man who has founded an egalitarian feminist commune in the heart of Southern Africa is just too cutely exotic, too cheaply high concept to work. My story is turning into the map in Borges exactly the size of the country it represents, but I feel I should probably say everything. Mating is a sprawling novel, its narrator a close and often critical (and self-critical) observer -- with a constant air of some detachment, the scholar in her trying to separate emotion from fact.His understandable antipathy to anthropologists -- "Most of the official great names in anthropology were mediocrities. Some were creeps" -- complicates matters too. Shepard, Jim (22 September 1991). "The Perfect Man, the Perfect Place, and Yet. . ". New York Times . Retrieved 28 January 2016. Recovering in Tsau, Denoon is silent, craves little beyond porridge and has lost interest in sex and his cherished issues of The Economist. Only one book interests him: the Tao Te Ching. Their precious conversational electricity has been extinguished; when she half-jokes that he was “saved—through the commercial impulse” of the merchants, he offers a cryptic reply. She fears he has suffered a nervous breakdown and takes him by plane to Gaborone for psychiatric treatment. At the end of the novel, after she has returned to the states, the narrator argues that the major affliction of our age is "corporatism unbound." She goes on to say "What is becoming sovereign in the world is not the people but the limited liability corporation . . . that's what's concentrating sovereign power to rape the world and overenrich the top minions who run these entities"; and, finally she asserts that the "true holocaust in the world is the thing we call development . . . the superimposition of market economies on traditional and unprepared third world cultures" [p. 471]. Have events in the past decade, in the United States and around the world, confirmed or refuted these arguments?