Fuji Superia X-TRA 3 Pack ISO 400 36 Exp. 35mm Film, Total 108 Exposures

Product Information

First, let’s talk about the more budget or consumer films for Fuji. In many ways Fuji c200 and Fuji Superia Xtra 400 are very similar. A commonality among Fuji films is cooler tones than Kodak and propensity toward greens in the shadows and, in some cases green overtones in general. This is due to the fact that Fuji films have an extra layer in their emulsions which tends to be cyan-green. Next you’ll do the same with contrast straight off a scan. For me, I actually prefer not very much contrast as I only scan, never enlarge, so I like fine tuning contrast in LR after I’ve scanned. Every time I do these comparisons I get traditionalists who are upset that I focus so much attention on scanning. To you folks, I would remind you that the same things that make a negative good for printmaking are also good things for scanning and just because I don’t go through the full enlarging process here doesn’t make this study less valid, even for folks who do. Fuji Superia’s lush greens are usually perfect for festival and outdoor scenes, but Venus 800 is a slightly more muted, cool affair. I found none of the almost over-saturated colour here, instead a realistic rendering of skin tones, grass, and a slightly blue cast – very subtle, and not too noticeable. Late in the night, on that day in which I nearly forgot to carry a roll of film, I found myself playing electric bass in the marching band at our high school’s football game. If the Valley seemed bleak and somber during the day, it burst into magnificent color at night. The raucous noise of a high school marching band and the garish threads of the band uniforms made for quite the spectacle, and for me it was a spectacle worth committing to film. During our third quarter break, while the rest of the band ran off to stuff their faces with nachos and hot dogs, I pulled out my little Nikon FG and lingered to watch the drumline perform for the crowd. Basically, whether you can or can’t shoot out-of-date film is determined by a number of different things.

Plates - Thermal | Fujifilm [United States] Plates - Thermal | Fujifilm [United States]

The Superia LH-PL plate boasts the same features and printing characteristics as the renowned LH-PJ plate, with the added capability of extended run lengths (up to 600,000 impressions) without baking. This plate is also processed through the same FLH-Z processor and with the same chemicals used with the Superia LH-PJ medium run plate, giving you the added flexibility of changing plates without changing developer. No processing means the elimination of processing chemicals and the associated costs, saving the customer significant time and money – all without compromise in quality. Compatible with most thermal platesetters, Fujifilm’s SUPERIA Ecomaxx-T is a non-ablative plate that carries a latent image with distinct contrast, allowing for simple inspection after imaging. Fujifilm Superia is fantastic for candid, everyday photography. However, I wouldn’t necessarily put it past someone to create great portraits with it. Though for what it’s worth, with the right lighting anything can work just swimmingly. But if I had to pool my network of photographers available to me at any moment of any day, I’d honestly say that the majority of people who use Fujifilm Superia are street photographers. Why? Well, it’s got a pretty nice look to it and it’s a very affordable film. In fact, I wonder why Fujifilm hasn’t tried to emulate the look in it’s X series cameras. I figure that it’s only a matter of time until we get it and perhaps the look of Instax since their cameras can wirelessly connect to the Fujifilm Instax printer. Fujifilm Superia would be an incredibly accurate film to replicate given that it is available in so many different ISO speeds. The new Classic Negative film simulation that’s found on Fujifilm’s latest cameras is intended to mimic Fujicolor Superia. Fujifilm doesn’t state which version of the film it’s intended to resemble; Fujifilm simply says that it’s “modeled after” Superia with “Superia-like” colors. They did very well in creating it, as it is unmistakably Superia. To me, straight-out-of-the-box Classic Negative most closely resembles Superia 200, although it’s not an exact match (but pretty close). There were at least a dozen different versions of Superia made by Fujifilm beginning in 1998, and a couple are still available today. I believe that Classic Negative can be made to resemble many of these different films. I started with Fujicolor Superia 100.Perhaps you can see in the bottom right-hand corner, there is some browny/yellow brush which seems more saturated in the Superia image than in the Portra image. Konica Big Mini BM-302 and Fujifilm Superia 400. Inverted by hand with no adjustments. A brief history of the Fujifilm Superia film line and the technology behind it. For those who are new to film, latitude is a term we use when we’re discussing how over or under exposed a film can be and still be “pleasant”. Of course, this score is not perfect and a lot of it has to do with taste. Many of these films suffer from color shifting when over- or under-exposing, which some find more appealing than others with certain films. But these scores represent the average latitude values I’ve been able to research from other reviewers, or as reported by the film manufacturers. A higher score here means a film is more flexible and forgiving. Street photographers, for example, my prefer a more forgiving film as conditions are constantly changing while shooting. Whilst a landscape photographer who is taking their time might be ok with a film that requires more precise attention to appropriate exposure values. For the trip, I brought my Leicaflex SL2 in combination with not one but two 35mm lenses (the f/2 Summicron as well as the PC Curtagon shift lens). As I had wisely loaded the film in complete darkness , I was able to obtain 40 frames from the single roll. An impressive number to be reduced to a not-so-much impressive count of 37 useful frames by camera operator error. By the way, my point-and-shoot cameras often get one more frame out of a Fuji than of a Kodak film. To have a little more room for exposure errors, I rated the Fuji Superia at EI 200. The Images – Day-Time Shots

Fujifilm X100V Film Simulation Recipe: Fujicolor Superia 1600 Fujifilm X100V Film Simulation Recipe: Fujicolor Superia 1600

Notice of discontinuation of some photographic film products". www.fujifilm.co.jp . Retrieved 2020-02-09. This film controls noise very well and is perhaps the smoothest of the films we’ve been comparing. It retains a lots of details in the shadows. Ektar has less exposure latitude than other color negative films, and when shot indoors it is better to shoot it as 32 ISO film. It might be hard to see, but with Portra 400 on the left, the overexposed areas aren’t as ‘blown out’ as they are with the Fuji on the right. Also, the Portra retains a bit more of the shadows than the Fuji does.I wonder if you think the new Classic Neg FujiFilm Simulation to be an even better (to life) choice. Not that there is any need for true renditions in photography. Fujifilm Superia is very much like many other negative films out there. Especially in the case of the case of the 1600 film, you’re best off giving it more light than it’s rated for. In some cases, I’d rate Fujifilm Superia 200 at ISO 100 and then develop it at ISO 200. Fujifilm Superia is available only in 35mm emulsions now unfortunately, so you’re not going to get the incredibly awesome quality that you typically get with 120. However, the images you get with 35mm will perhaps be more personal and meaningful as the small format lends itself to ease of use in terms of exposures.