All Our Yesterdays

Product Information

Realistic, anchored by vivifying detail, crowded with wonderfully vibrant characters, luminous with deep feeling, responsiveness, and sympathy."— Publishers Weekly A person at a certain moment will not look his own soul in the face any more. Because he is afraid, if he looks it in the face, of not having the courage to go on living any more. Mostly though, the relationships that develop between the book’s characters are strained. This applies between parents and children, siblings, and married couples. Many of them seem to have a sense of the village as an oppressive place, where they are forced to conform to the expectations of family and society, rather than follow their own wishes. The characters have a tendency to be brutally honest with each other.

There is one book . . . which has meant more to me than any other: The Little Virtues, by the Italian novelist, essayist, playwright, short-story writer, translator, and political activist Natalia Ginzburg."— The New Yorker Sept. 2016 NYRB: Jhumpa Lahiri & Cynthia Zarin discuss Natalia Ginzburg's Valentino & Sagittarius". Community Bookstore. 2020-08-13 . Retrieved 2020-10-29. Sally Rooney, in her introduction, says she hopes readers new to Ginzburg will fall in love with her What I think about now, I tell a little of it to myself, and then I bury it. I send it underground. Then, little by little, I shall not tell things any more even to myself. I shall drive everything underground at once, every random thought, before it can take shape." Sometimes I watch you go by at the garden gate, and you have a way of walking by which one can tell you are not happy.”

Since fact seems to be the daughter's currency, the stories come to us spare and unadorned. But the lives that are revealed are rich with incident and drama. The years of the narrative range from the mid 1930s to the late 1940s. Some of the people in the village are or have been fascists, others are socialists, a few are communists. Some have survived the war, some haven't. Marriages take place and children are born though there is little evidence of any deep love between the people involved even if some of them preserve the fiction of being in love. It was as if her writing was a very important secret that I had been waiting all my life to discover . . . her words seemed to express something completely true about my experience of living, and about life.’ Sally Rooney Me - as an individual of 2021 - safely separated from the horrors of World War II, I am much more in favour of Individual Choice. We are able to control our individual destiny with choice. I choose to love; it is possible for me to adapt, to live within the constraints and liberties of my present time. La poesia è sempre stata questo: far passare il mare in un imbuto; fissarsi uno strettissimo numero di mezzi espressivi e cercare d’esprimere con quello qualcosa d’estremamente complesso.

One son dies in car accident. The mother laments two children lost to her through emigration: a son in Venezuela and a daughter in South Africa. Maybe they are happy, but does it matter if they and the grandchildren are not seen again? The author’s mosquito-like tendencies are echoed in her character Anna. In Ginzburg’s coolly repetitious indirect speech Cenzo Rena tells Anna that while “there were certain things that women ought to know, she knew nothing because she had always lived like an insect. She had always lived like an insect in a swarm of other insects.” Later, when Cenzo Rena is ill, he says it would be a “disaster” if he died, “because, when all was said and done, he had never made her turn into a real person at all, when all was said and done she was still just an insect, a little lazy, sad insect in a leaf, he himself had been just a big leaf to her”. Initially, the voices of the title seem to be mainly one voice, the mother's, speaking her thoughts aloud as she walks alongside her daughter. Her's are disconnected thoughts, roaming over a variety of subjects, often triggered by houses they pass on the way or people they see, or random thoughts and questions that occur to her. The narrator is the silent target of the mother's monologue, only speaking when the mother expresses her impatience at receiving no response to her questions: Couldn't we sometimes have the miracle of a word from you? We are experiencing delays with deliveries to many countries, but in most cases local services have now resumed. For more details, please consult the latest information provided by Royal Mail's International Incident Bulletin.A stunning tour de force, The Little Virtues is a credo of undaunted idealism."— The New York Times Book Review Here is someone who shares the experiences of daily life but also brings a fully formed moral and intellectual compass that allows you to see these experiences more objectively. From the smallest components of domestic life, she builds a world with the ethical complexity of the great 19th-century novels. The evocative human way in which she describes living through war. How it can feel surreal at first. You continue to laugh, cry, grieve in ordinary ways. Then when the war is right next door, you continue to laugh, cry, grieve, except the grieving becomes an endless thing. Grieving for 'all the yesterdays', the memories you can't recall, the finer details lost to time and reality. Grieving for all the people whom you have passionately hated and loved. Then there is an intangible grieving that transcends words. The story takes place over one year—October through October of the following year. The story follow a large Italian family consisting of brothers and sisters and aunts and uncles and each one’s respective e spouse. We are TOLD what they do but little comes across in relation to what kind of person they are. We are occasionally told X is cheerful, Y is melancholy and X smart, but we are given little evidence of why such statements are true. The only person for whom I recognized a character trait is the narrator’s mother. She continually gripes about her health. We are told umpteen times that she has a lump in her throat and that the doctor told her she had high blood pressure, having always had low blood pressure before. Almost the exact same words are used over and over again. In this respect, the writing is repetitive. What we are told about the characters is primarily what they do. In a novel, I want to observe the decisions characters make. This helps me form an opinion about who they are. I like character studies—you do not get that here. There are too many characters and too little information is provided about each. The information provided is told rather than shown.

Born in Palermo, Sicily in 1916, Ginzburg spent most of her youth in Turin with her family, as her father in 1919 took a position with the University of Turin. Her father, Giuseppe Levi, a renowned Italian histologist, was born into a Jewish Italian family, and her mother, Lidia Tanzi, was Catholic. [1] [2] Her parents were secular and raised Natalia, her sister Paola (who would marry Adriano Olivetti) and her three brothers as atheists. [3] Their home was a center of cultural life, as her parents invited intellectuals, activists and industrialists. At age 17 in 1933, Ginzburg published her first story, I bambini, in the magazine Solaria. To me, All Our Yesterdays is a perfect novel, which is to say, it is completely what it is attempting to be, and nothing else. It is a book that shows in simple and intelligent prose both how large and how small a novel ought to be. Its stakes are as high as the most cataclysmic crisis of the 20th century, and as low as the marriage of one young woman, the fate of one family dog. As readers, we come to see and feel the inextricable relations between the inner and outer worlds of human beings. Ginzburg’s novels manage not only to accommodate, but to place into a meaningful relationship the intimate lives of fictional characters and the radical social and political changes unfolding around them. This accomplishment is made possible by Ginzburg’s extraordinary understanding of the human soul, by her brilliance as a prose stylist and above all by her incomparable moral clarity. All Our Yesterdays is among the great novels of its century, and Ginzburg among the great novelists. Speaking for myself, as a reader, as a writer and as a human being, her work has touched and transformed my life. I hope that you might give it the opportunity to do the same to yours. Considered among the best writers in contemporary Italy, Ginzburg should appeal to a wide American audience with this collection of essays."— Publishers Weekly Caro Michele (1973). No Way, transl. Sheila Cudahy (1974); Dear Michael, transl. Sheila Cudahy (1975); Happiness, As Such, transl. Minna Zallman Proctor (2019) – adapted for the film Caro Michele (1976) In the second part of the novel, Italy too is at war. Anna is by this time married, a young mother, helping to conceal fugitives from the fascist regime in the cellar of her home. In one long tumbling sentence, from the point of view of the man who has become Anna’s husband, Ginzburg evokes the catastrophic unravelling of ordinary life:At the heart of the novel is a concern with experiences that both deepen and deaden existence: adultery and air raids, neighbourhood quarrels and bombings. With her signature clear-eyed wit, Ginzburg asks how we can act with integrity when faced with catastrophe, and how we can love well. Ginzburg’s experiences of the war, and the experiences of her characters, differ in a key way from my family’s, of course. My family were on the winning side. The war effort pursued in the armed forces by my maternal grandfather, and in the civil service by my paternal grandfather – a quaker, and therefore a ‘conchie’, or conscientious objector – and by both my grandmothers, who each had to sign the Official Secrets Act to perform their roles, was against a combination of an ideology and a group of nations in the form of the Axis powers. For Ginzburg and her characters, though, ideology and nationality are separate: the fascists do not represent Italy for them, and when the Germans sweep in they are treated like an invading force, not friendly partners. Indeed the English, when they finally arrive, remind the Italians of the Germans: ‘The contandini … stood spellbound looking at these soldiers dressed like the Germans in yellowish cloth with short trousers and blond, hairy knees.’ However, ‘the contandini were very pleased indeed with these new soldiers who did not kill them’. I hesitate to talk about the trajectory of Anna, the character who the reader follows as she navigates different worlds and different periods of her life because it would be spoilers. Yet her story is the one that elucidates pain and sacrifice; invisibility and powerlessness; fragility and naivety. If Anna is the foundation, Signora Maria is the glue. Signora Maria's character is a kind of symbol, as is Ippolito, the brother, Cenzo Rena, the family friend who they believe owns a castle, and Franz, the stepmother's ex-lover who marries the step-daughter. So many meaningful characters appear in this novel and they each play a role, that is, they appear with a defined purpose. Natalia Ginzburg was born in Palermo, Italy in 1916. She was an Italian author whose work explored family relationships, politics during and after the Fascist years and World War II, and philosophy. She wrote novels, short stories, and essays, for which she received the Strega Prize and Bagutta Prize. Modest and intensely reserved, Ginzburg never shied away from the traumas of history, whether writing about the Turin of her childhood, the Abruzzi countryside, or contemporary Rome—all the while approaching those traumas only indirectly, through the mundane details and catastrophes of personal life. Most of her works were also translated into English and published in the United Kingdom and United States. She wrote acclaimed translations of both Proust and Flaubert into Italian. She died in Rome in 1991. Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter G" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences . Retrieved 25 July 2014.

Natalia Ginzburg, a glowing light of modern Italian literature, should be more widely read and fervidly known by American readers.”— The New York Times Book Review Yet, despite this confidence and optimism, the ravages of the war remained with my grandparents their entire lives – and the impact was felt by their children and grandchildren. At my maternal grandparents’ ruby wedding in 1981, when I was eleven years old, my grandfather gave a speech in which he mentioned the people who could not be with us to celebrate. Among these were a series of names I didn’t recognise, and neither did any of those present. They were his dead war comrades. To this day I can’t be sure when or how they died – he refused to discuss it, just as he refused to take part in any form of remembrance ceremony. He remembered in his way, he insisted. This was his grief. Cenzo Rena’s patronising pronouncement fails to comprehend the power of belonging to a “swarm”: the value of sharing and moving together, with a joint mission. He has already declared that he is no communist, for the most trivial of reasons (“he had a horror of living with anyone and for that reason Communism would never suit him, for he had been told that a large number of people had to live together in the same house”). Anna, who is young yet knows her mind, understands what it is to feel part of a force for change. She remembers sitting round a table with her lively, politically active brothers – even if, like Ginzburg, she was doing more listening than talking. Emeric Pressburger’s 1966 novel The Glass Pearls, now reissued, is a very different type of war-themed fiction. Pressburger is best known as the screenwriting half of one of the last century’s great film-making duos: along with Michael Powell he produced masterpiece after masterpiece in the 1940s, from The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp to The Red Shoes.These are characters from whom the war has taken a great deal, almost everything. But the challenge that faces them in the end is to make sense of a world that is no longer at war, a world in which heroic acts of courage are no longer necessary or even possible, a world in which newspapers have to “come out every day with the rising of the sun”. All Our Yesterdays was published seven years after the end of the war, and it is difficult not to hear Ginzburg’s own voice in this passage, sitting and grinding away at her desk, “without either danger or fear”, trying to make sense of what remains. This is not a novel that turns its face away from evil. Like any story of the second world war, it tells of almost unendurable grief, loss, violence and injustice. But it is also a story about the possibility of knowing what is right, and living by that knowledge, whatever the consequences. As readers, we understand and love the novel’s characters in all their humanity – and for a moment or two, their courage seems to illuminate, in a flash of radiance, the meaning of human life. And yet, at the novel’s close, after the war has ended, Ginzburg is careful to show the difficult task that awaits those who survive. A character who has spent the war editing an anti-fascist publication struggles to adjust to his new working conditions: Beginning in 1950, when Ginzburg married again and moved to Rome, she entered the most prolific period of her literary career. During the next 20 years, she published most of the works for which she is best known. She and Baldini were deeply involved in the cultural life of the city. The experience informed her work: when she began to write stories as a schoolgirl she finished them with similar haste, she reveals in her 1949 essay “ Il mio mestiere” (“My Vocation”). “Perhaps this seems a rather stupid explanation; nevertheless that is how it was.”