Automotive SPICE Essentials: Automotive SPICE v3.1 – at a glance (E/E Engineering Essentials)

Product Information

Schmittner, C., et al.: Innovation and transformation in a digital world-27th interdisciplinary information management talks. Trauner Verlag Universitat 2019, 401–409 (2019) Module Design: Creating software requirements that match system requirements and developing service units When a premium OEM compared suppliers that use ASPICE against those that did not, it discovered that the average ASPICE supplier found 90 percent of defects 11 months before the start of production, whereas the average non-ASPICE supplier found 90 percent Include stakeholders and team members. Ensure awareness of the reasons for and guidelines of ASPICE standards. This will help you to allocate the resources to begin operating under the new best practices.

The automobile of the 2020s hasn’t just transcended crank starters and wood paneling; today’s automobiles integrate multiple technologies developed by teams across industries all over the globe. The automobile market has evolved to include everything from self- or assisted-driving technology, automated safety features, and various green technologies, including electric and hybrid options. Increasing regulation: With the increasing complexity of auto systems and a focus on reducing climate impact, auto manufacturers will have to comply with new and possibly shifting regulations across different entities. ASPICE doesn’t specify how the development process should be conducted. It determines what should be done and what results should be achieved. Therefore, it’s possible to implement certain strengths of agile methodology, so the target results could be achieved in shorter cycles with the flexibility to apply changes during the process, which would be very difficult in a traditional waterfall approach. In other words, by combining ASPICE with agile, the working products can be produced faster and without concerns about software quality.

Korsaa, M., et al.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Software: Evolution Process 25(4), 381–391 (2013)

More than a hundred million lines of code. That’s what goes into the design and manufacturing of today’s vehicles. Our cars have become so incredibly software-driven in recent years that the only thing more complex may be the people who operate them. Messnarz, R., Ekert, D.: Assessment‐based learning systems - learning from best projects. In: Wiley Inerscience, Software Process Improvement in Practice, Volume12, Issue6, Special Issue: Special Issue on Industrial Experiences in SPI, pp. 569–577 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.347,The SPICE standard began as a way to provide a framework for independent assessors to evaluate an organization’s capability for software development. Messnarz, R., König, F., Bachmann, V.O.: Experiences with trial assessments combining automotive spice and functional safety standards. In: Winkler D., O’Connor R.V., Messnarz R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 301. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_23 To sum up, the best and most recommended approach is adhering to both ASPICE and ISO 26262 standards. This is the optimal way to keep the risks of potential failures at a minimum, especially for critical Automotive systems. ASPICE vs CMMI 2.0

ASPICE focuses on continuous process improvement to raise the supplier’s capability level. In ISO 26262, the focus is on filling all the gaps in compliance identified by the audit. Also, ASPICE takes into consideration the cost and schedule of the development schedule. On the contrary, ISO 26262 primarily targets functional safety. Level 3: Established. You have established and set the performance standards for the organization and continuously evaluate and learn from them. Module Design, or the creation of software requirements to match the system requirements and the development of service units. A standard work on using Automotive SPICE ® in practice – the second edition of this handy guide for users and assessors on interpreting Automotive SPICE ®. This book has been thoroughly revised based on the new Version 3 of Automotive SPICE ®. With all these integrated systems, and their interconnectivity inside and outside the vehicle, more things can go wrong. And when a system malfunctions, it can do so with catastrophic results. Just read the headlines when new technology fails and you’ll see how devastating it can be. Failure is not only problematic for the driver and others on the roads, but also to automotive progress which is brought to a screeching halt when critical safety errors occur. When an entire industry can be impacted by a single, serious incident, compliance becomes imperative

What is Automotive SPICE (ASPICE)?

As other teams and manufacturers looked for software suppliers, this SPICE score could serve as one way to evaluate whether the developer can meet certain standards for performance, safety, and quality. Though the SPICE standard didn’t gain much traction in other development fields, it did start to take hold in automotive as German auto manufacturers began using it. Control the process: ASPICE gives teams clear guidance for evaluating and controlling their development processes, which can help ensure product quality, shorten time to market, and reduce costs. Suppliers select members of their teams who have at least three years of relevant work experience to complete provisional ASPICE assessor training and certification through the International Accessors Certification Scheme (Intacs),

Veledar, O., Damjanovic-Behrendt, V., Macher, G.: Digital Twins for dependability improvement of autonomous driving. In: European Conference on Software Process Improvement, pp. 415–426 (2019)

Working within ASPICE will give teams a competitive edge over other suppliers and OEMs who are not yet using the standard. Stolfa, J., et al.: Automotive quality universities - AQUA alliance extension to higher education. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, R., Poth, A., Messnarz, R.: (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 633. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_14 ISO - International Organization for Standardization. IEC 61025 Fault tree analysis (FTA), December 2006 Wooden panels and beltless bench seating have gone the way of the dinosaurs, and vehicles have become increasingly sophisticated with every passing year. A major part of that? Embedded systems and automotive software. So why have functional safety requirements become more standardized while automotive software standards remain touch and go? Korsaa, M., et al.: The SPI manifesto and the ECQA SPI manager certification scheme. J. Software: Evolution Process 24(5), 525–540 (2012)