About this deal
The ROG Maximus Z790 HERO’s VRM design includes 20 individual power stages for delivering the i5-13600K a lot of power. In addition, the heat generated by such an outstanding VRM design (and the associated PWM fan headers and huge aluminum heat sinks) is likely eliminated thanks to the amazing design. Well, the hits keep on coming, Intel has managed to push the limits even further now with the 13th Gen CPUs, especially with the i9-13900K which has a crazy max turbo speed of 5.8 GHz. In all of our single-core and single-thread tests, the 13900K took...
Intel® Core™ i5-13600KF Processor Intel® Core™ i5-13600KF Processor
AMD's Ryzen 7000 still holds the advantage in all power consumption metrics, including peak power and efficiency, resulting in more forgiving cooling requirements and a cooler and quieter system. However, AMD has increased its power consumption significantly with this generation, so the advantage isn't as pronounced as we've seen in the past.For as long as I can remember, I've had love of all things tech, spurred on, in part, by a love of gaming. I began working on computers owned by immediate family members and relatives when I was around 10 years old. I've always sought to learn as much as possible about anything PC, leading to a well-rounded grasp on all things tech today. In my role at PCMag, I greatly enjoy the opportunity to share what I know. Raptor Lake consumes more power than Alder Lake, but it is also much faster than its predecessor, earning it some leeway. Nevertheless, as we see in our renders-per-day measurements, AMD still holds the advantage in efficiency and all key power criteria. Intel's system consumes more power, resulting in higher thermal output.
Intel® Core™ i5-13600K Processor
The Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X vs Core i5-13600K competition is close in single-threaded work, but the Core i5-13600K proves its mettle in multi-threaded work. So this way you'll get more accurate results on how the CPU actually performs., narrowing the bias and other factors involved which could impact the accuracy of these benchmarks. Given this information, it seemed likely that these processors would trade places, depending on the test, but instead the Core i5-13600K performs better in every test. It doesn't win by a wide margin in some tests, but it does win. The Core i5-12600K, for its part, was left in the dust,and the Core i5-13600K even manages to perform slightly better than the 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X in a few tests. (That said, the Core i5 lost to the 16-core/32-thread Ryzen 9 7950X badly in most tests, as you'd expect.) The system is powered by a SilverStone DA850 850-watt power supply and built into a Praxis Wetbench open-air chassis with a 1TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD. All tests were performed inside of Windows 11 with the latest Windows updates.
The Core i5-13600K vs Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X battle ends in a five-to-three win in Intel's favor, though each of the Ryzen chips has its own distinct advantages and disadvantages in our different categories. The big concern we have here: The climbing price of Core i5 processors will also likely mean budget-friendly options released further down the road will also cost more. This is a trend we have seen far too much of in recent years, and Intel certainly isn’t alone here, but that doesn’t counter our disappointment at this generational price increase.
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best Gaming CPU | TechPowerUp
The chart above shows a current mystery which isn't really clear. The 7XXX CPUs are not scaling with gaming performance. I understand how increasing the cores wouldn't help and I do understand how there is an issue with only a single chiplet being used in some circumstances, but AMDs chips are raising the boost as they go up in bin just like Intel but they aren't showing increases in performance going above 7700X. Is there some type of cap being introduced on the AM5 platform which some setups are being impacted, but other setups are not? Realistically, these results suggest what we already know from the specs: The Core i5-13600K and the Core i5-14600K are more or less the same chip in practical terms, even if the specs vary a smidge. Performance versus the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X remained competitive, with the two Core i5 processors far ahead of their rivals in all tests except for Adobe Photoshop, which let the Ryzen 7 7700X have a rare win. Specifications: Intel. This looks like nothing more than a repeat of CPU Pricing and Value. In other words, just a way to give Intel another win. The increased power draw has an effect, though — the 7700X and 7600X have a 105W TDP rating and a max power draw of 142W, the highest power consumption of the Ryzen 7 and 5 chips yet.It's also much higher than the previous-gen’s 65W TDP rating. The Ryzen chips are designed to use the full thermal headroom available to deliver more performance, so they can safely operate at 95C under heavy load. We don’t see that much with the Ryzen 7 and 5 models, though.Drivers and Software: Intel. Not sure what this is supposed to even mean. I do know I've never seen AMD win or tie in it though so it seems it's there just to get another win. Both are generally just fine with the occasional problem now and then. I'd call it a tie. The Intel Core i5-13600K vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X rivalry is a heated battle in the heart of gamer country — the mid-range price points — with Intel's 13th-Gen Raptor Lakex86 hybrid architecture squaring off against AMD's chiplet-based Zen 4 Ryzen 7000family. These two fundamentally different approaches have shaken up our list of the best CPUs for gaming as the Intel vs AMDbattle enters a new phase. Last week I looked at the Intel Core i9 13900K performance under Linux while today the focus is on the Core i5 13600K. The Core i5 13600K is a 14-core / 20-thread processor (6 P cores + 8 E cores), up from 6 P cores + 4 E cores with the prior generation C... These wins, however, were slim, and the Core i5-14600K and the Core i5-13600K tied for first place against the faster and more expensive competition in all of the other tests. This suggests that so long as you have a graphics card on the level of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 or anything slower, you really have no need to buy any of these faster and more costly processors for gaming and gaming alone. They're mainly relevant from a pure-gaming perspective if you're trying to compete in the upper echelon of esports with a high-refresh monitor and a top-end video card like the GeForce RTX 4090. (Of course, you might want the extra CPU horsepower for other non-gaming tasks, which is a whole other matter.) The Core i5-14600K and the Core i5-13600K will do just fine. Both Ryzen 7000 and Raptor Lake's modern connectivity technologies bring big increases in throughput via DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0 interfaces, but Intel also chose to continue to support DDR4 memory to offer a less-expensive path for builders. Meanwhile, AMD's decision to support only DDR5 has proven to be a pricing pain point.