The New Puritans: How the Religion of Social Justice Captured the Western World

Product Information

In this punchy polemic the author articulately rails against the excesses of the "woke" left. Some very solid arguments, well presented and mostly engaging to read. Andrew Doyle highlights how the issue in higher education goes onto to permeate in corporate institutions. higher education students he highlights how students are being taught that reality is constructed through language and language is a tool for oppression, a generation of arts and social science graduates “have taken this ideology into adult life and the institutions they now occupy.” The New Puritans is a passionate and erudite exposé of the modern-day social-justice movement. With clarity and precision, Doyle exposes its countless flaws and hypocrisies. His book is an essential guide for anyone looking to understand why the culture war has grown so hot.— City Journal

The New Puritans: How the religion of social justice captured The New Puritans: How the religion of social justice captured

Basically while I think the aims of the Social Justice movement are laudable, I think their methods are horrific and counterproductive. This was always my gut instinct but since I supported the end goals, as it started to unfold I did sit on the sidelines at the beginning as I wondered if perhaps the people preaching these methods might be on to something because I agree with them on these other issues. But the more time that passed the more alarmed I become, especially as it reminded me more of how I was treated by Christians who were convinced of their moral superiority while growing up. Basically I know first hand how alienating is it to be treated that way and how it is a good way to turn outsiders away from your cause. And I feel as though Doyle had a good grasp of the shortfalls of the movement. That said, I feel that his accusations against the Social Justice movement were also rather vague even if I could think of good examples for him for every charge he lobbed. Doyle isn't the first author to examine the methods and motivations of woke fanatics, and he won't be the last. However, I doubt whether anyone will do so with more style or generosity of spirit . . .— Conservative Woman Similarly, the rights of transgender people are important, the rights of women are important, and how do we deal with situations where these may be in tension? At least one obvious premise of the book is that simply assuming bad faith, indulging in name calling, and piling on the “unrighteous” is not only unethical, but ineffective. It has helped to rob important discussions of the nuance they require. Doyle's study is sprinkled with humour and is analytical and timely. One doesn't have to agree with it fully to recognise he speaks plenty of sense.— Irish ExaminerFollowers of these movements were sanctimonious and fired up by an abrasive, religious passion. But at a time when Enlightenment thinkers and sceptics of religion such as Voltaire and David Hume considered non-white people to be inferior, the moral universalism of figures such as Cowper is remarkable. In The New Puritans, Andrew Doyle powerfully examines the underlying belief-systems of this ideology, and how it has risen so rapidly to dominate all major political, cultural and corporate institutions. He reasons that, to move forward, we need to understand where these new puritans came from and what they hope to achieve. Written in the spirit of optimism and understanding, Doyle offers an eloquent and powerful case for the reinstatement of liberal values and explains why it’s important we act now. I do not state that I feel it was right that trump should have been deplatformed lightly. And I admit I might be wrong. Social media is so new that I don't think we have good, empirical data on how best to manage it. My thinking now is that when a public figure with as much power as trump did misuses it in the manner that he did and with the dire consequences that resulted then that public figure needs to face serious consequences. In this lucid, important book, the satirist and commentator Andrew Doyle zeroes in on the religiosity of these movements . . . He is supremely erudite and writes beautifully. Anyone with an interest in contemporary culture and politics should read this book.— Matthew d'Ancona, Tortoise Media A sober but devastating skewering of cancel culture and the moral certainties it shares with religious fundamentalism’ Sunday Times

The New Puritans: How the Religion of Social Justice Captured The New Puritans: How the Religion of Social Justice Captured

I can easily imagine how all sorts of people whose worldview I as a radical feminist am completely opposed to would use this book to try and justify their inhumane opinions on certain things. There isn't anything offensive per say because the author is relatively nice and soft compared to many people in the same camp - the camp of sceptics, rational thinkers, sorta cynics, those for the total freedom of speech etc. But some things can be interpreted wrongly and used unjustly against some of us really fighting for our rights that are really under threat. What I'm leading to is his criticism of the idea of "lived experience". I agree wholeheartedly that a lot of the times it's used nowadays is to support claims unsupportable by real evidence and logic. However, the conclusion that I come to in relation to that is that this concept, first proposed to be used in such a context by Simone de Beauvoir, has been stolen from us and used in all the inappropriate ways that it wasn't meant to be, thus discrediting it in the eyes of many people. And, to my mind, a clear distinction has to be made between using it to talk about sexual abuse (stigmatized, old as the world itself, most of the time not even seen as what it is because of how deeply misogynistic our world is) and all other sorts of things that can at least theoretically be thought in terms of true and false... But Doyle goes on to mash all the uses of this concept, that has been of great help to even begin talking about sexual abuse as a problem because I guess it's really hard to recognize just how ubiquitous something so dehumanizing can be in a society that thinks of itself as liberal and democtaric, together, his critisism beginning not with those who appropriated and discredited the term but with Simone de Beauvoir herself. One cannot argue”, Doyle says, “with someone who believes that argument itself is an oppressive denial of his or her truth”. Doyle is a traditional left winger, who saw his fellow left wingers captured by what he may describe as metaphorical dark forces, as a political pole shift has occured and yet Doyle and many others do not at all fit into the traditional right wing or “alt right”. That’s pretty much been my response to the entire book, positive and not really necessary to be explained in more detail… So I’d rather include here a long paragraph with my criticism to a specific section that I wrote in my notes. Writing in 1693, the puritan minister Cotton Mather defended his role in Bridget Bishop's trial in Salem by claiming that there was ‘little occasion to prove the Witchcraft, it being evident and notorious to all beholders'. This common logical fallacy is known as the ‘appeal to self-evident truth’, and is similarly characteristic of the new puritans. Rather than initiate a discussion about difficult issues, they exhibit the infuriating tendency to simply make assertions, and treat with hostility anyone who challenges them. Without the standard of objective truth, the demons of unreason will flourish.The New Puritans is a fusillade of uncompromising reason but reason with compassion. Andrew Doyle has written a masterful broadside against the woke that will also discomfit the anti-woke, proposing to both the radical notion that rather than being identities, we embrace our status as individuals.— Critic The first thing to be said about this book is that Andrew Doyle can write. He writes fluently, with examples, with an amusing sense of irony, and he writes convincingly . . . fine prose, razor sharp wit, and insight— European Conservative Doyle has been so thoroughly slandered as a right-wing demagogue that you might expect The New Puritans to be one of those anti-snowflake polemics. However, he offers a conditional defence of Eighties PC culture, which he believes “achieved some genuinely progressive outcomes in terms of social consciousness without having recourse to the kind of censorial police intervention or the mob-driven retributive ‘cancel culture’ that we see today ”. In fact, Doyle considers the heirs to the PC-gone-mad tabloid columnists of the 1980s to be the whiteness-gone-mad progressives of the 2 020s, who seize on highly individual incidents, dubious anecdotes and obvious myths to peddle hysteria about societal doom. Like fear of crime rising as the frequency of crime drops, “the unremitting focus on victimhood has seemingly escalated as social attitudes have progressed ”. Andrew Doyle has written a masterful broadside against the woke that will also discomfit the anti-woke, proposing to both the radical notion that rather than being identities, we embrace our status as individuals’ Critic

The New Puritans: How the Religion of Social Justice Ca…

I wasn't aware of him prior to a friend recommending this book - but in both positive and negative ways Andrew Doyle reminds me of Owen Jones. In particular, we are bad at navigating the ethics of situations where the rights of individuals or groups have some level of tension with another. This was obvious in the acute stage of the COVID pandemic where the rights of individuals around vaccination, for instance have an inherent clash with the rights of groups of vulnerable people. We aren’t good in dealing with such matters without resorting to name calling. The journalist Helen Lewis explored the link between contemporary social justice and religious faith in a recent BBC Radio 4 documentary, The Church of Social Justice. As traditional religion has declined in both Britain and the US, Lewis argues, politics has taken its place. Many of us now carry our political beliefs with an intensity that previous generations reserved for religion.

This is, I believe, a very important book. The interesting thing is that I don’t agree with all of it by any means, and my personal politics are probably not highly aligned with the author’s, but that’s rather the point. This book is a call to arms in an existential battle . . . it's thrilling to be led by such a brilliant commander— Spectator A sober but devastating skewering of cancel culture and the moral certainties it shares with religious fundamentalism— Sunday Times Overall, though, since this is such an important issue I think it is something that does need a lot of thoughtful discussion and research to find the best approach to deal with propaganda and authoritarianism while preserving free speech on social media and elsewhere.