Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Yazar geçtiğimiz yıllarda sokakta kadınlara laf atan erkeklerle ilgili bir haber çalışmasında sahada (sokakta) görev alıyor ve laf atan erkeklere laf anlatmaya çalışırken 'fikir değiştirmenin doğası'nı daha çok kurcalamaya başlıyor. Kitabın fikri de burada pişiyor. The endless chasing of the slightly-better external environment can really make things worse. It can manufacture dissatisfaction with a situation that would have seemed totally fine and lovely if we hadn’t thought of it as second best – and second best not to a specific picture of a better life, but to the vague idea that things could be better. To crib an insight from the Buddhists, past a certain point – if your needs are satisfied and you have love, projects, safety, fun – the route to making things feel better is not in fiddling with the external environment. It’s in fiddling with how you react to it. Eleanor says: When someone becomes your in-law, you get thrust into quite an intimate relationship. They’re in your house, your family, your parenting, your holidays, your life decisions, your emotional moments – but you didn’t get to test drive your compatibility in handling those things together. I obviously misunderstood. I thought I was invited to dinner, but it turned out to be a late afternoon tea. Instead of a 3 course dinner I was given a cup of tea and a plate of Tim Tams.
While it’s true that some people find meaning in their career or use it to forge an identity they’re proud of, the fact that’s true for them doesn’t mean it should be for you. You’re not deviant for feeling this way – I’ve said elsewhere that the idea that work has moral value unto itself is a myth we pay for with the one resource we can never replenish: our time.
Eleanor Gordon-Smith
It’s not that you got the decision “right”, just that once you’ve made it, you can finally cease looking at life with evaluative eyes, and live it instead. I read a lot, work on [podcast] episode plans, put several thousand post-it notes on the wall – each one a piece of tape from an interview, a fact, a piece of theory, a well-phrased, or a scene – and rearrange them until I can see a story unfolding alongside a philosophical idea. I read philosophy, listen to a lot of radio and podcasts because there are so many clever people in that sphere whose work I admire, and try to stop by 9pm. Although if I’m honest, that’s rare these days. You wrote a book – what is it about? The space, time and freedom to be creative in the arts seems vitally more important to both of us than a 9 to 5 job, which we would largely be doing just to pay the bills and would detract from our real goals and passions.
Su’s clear lectures and availability to students outside of the classroom won praise. Wrote one student, “Aaron’s ability to be precise, sensible and approachable while thoughtfully answering my questions in office hours challenged me to think more critically about each of my course assignments and the way I approach anthropological writing more broadly.” William Wen At TEC, we firmly believe ethics is a team sport. It’s a conversation about how we should act, live, treat others and be treated in return. Students were grateful to Hommel for his proactive assistance and well-organized material. One called him “the most helpful, patient and understanding preceptor I've had. He did not just give answers — he worked to make sure everyone understood the topics on a fundamental level. It would have been a much more difficult — and much less pleasant — class without him.” Hannah McLaughlin
Given the inevitability of interacting with her long term, it might also help to think about how you can tolerate these feelings when you can’t change the situation. It was Hommel’s first time as a preceptor, and he “absolutely hit it out of the park,” Plagborg-Møller said. “Nicolas’ dedication, deep insight into the material and gentle personality made his precepts an essential bulwark against the stress of my demanding lectures.” The book begins with an account of a rather fascinating experiment that Gordon-Smith conducted, where she asked men who catcalled her on the street why they engaged in that behavior. Many of the men insisted the women liked being catcalled, and Gordon-Smith became fascinated with her inability to convince these men that no, women do not. No amount of personal anecdote or researched evidence could convince these men. Then the book shifts into a series of case studies of people who did change their minds in different scenarios. Each of these stories is fascinating and well-written. How do I give up that interest without resentment of a level that would, I am quite certain, very negatively affect the relationship? I can’t see any other hobby to pursue . I’m also not prone to obsessive interests for short periods of time so this interest is not a passing fad. It seems to be a lose-lose situation. Where’s the win-win? I cannot see a happy compromise or middle ground for either of us.
The text comprises interviews after a researcher/journalist fashion, with relevant context and the ideas of a number of philosophers sprinkled around , provoking thought about how people become who they are, perhaps even change who they are (depending on definition), what they accept and reject and how that comes about. You asked what you should do. You sound strikingly clear about how you feel: you can’t bear it any more, you feel rage, you want her not to come and stay. These don’t sound like the kind of feelings you should be expected to endure indefinitely. I love her commentary on “reasonable debate” and how dumb we’ve let things get as a society based on our own assumptions of knowing where the line is. Especially when people have been moving the goal posts to let in more and more reprehensible commentary publicly.
Stop Being Reasonable
Likewise, after a person has become committed and fully invested in a relationship, the person may enter a state of total denial about the shortcomings of their lover. When people fall in love, they make a leap of faith and trust the other person, even when skepticism would be more rational. The belief that you love another person is often not an evidence-based belief, and people's lives revolve around the people they love, whether that is reasonable or not.
Great Deal 
New Comment