Doctor Who Revisitations 3 (The Tomb of the Cybermen/The Three Doctors/The Robots of Death) [DVD]

Product Information

But there is a menace deep inside the Pandora Institute. And Kate, Osgood and Josh must face their darkest fears… Bjorklund, D. F. (1989). Children’s thinking—Developmental function and individual differences. Brooks/Cole. Ibrahim, J. G., & LipsitzChen, S. R. M. H. (1999). Missing covariates in generalized linear models when the missing data mechanism is nonignorable. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 61(1), 173–190.

In the years since the Stangmoor Prison incident, Captain Chin Lee found a new calling. She now heads up an international organisation, dedicated to meditation and ‘mental fortitude’ training.

Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Ximénez, M. C., & Abad, F. J. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicológica, 21(1–2), 157–173. Qiao, X., & Jiao, H. (2018). Data mining techniques in analyzing process data: A didactic. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2231. van der Linden, W. J., Jeon, M., & Ferrara, S. (2011). A paradox in the study of the benefits of test−item review. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48(4), 380–398. Liu, O. L., Bridgeman, B., Gu, L., Xu, J., & Kong, N. (2015). Investigation of response changes in the GRE revised general test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(6), 1002–1020.

Pohl, S., Ulitzsch, E., & von Davier, M. (2019). Using response times to model not-reached items due to time limits. Psychometrika, 84(3), 829–892. Bezirhan U, von Davier M, & Grabovsky I. (2020). Multiple group hierarchical speed accuracy revisit model. In Paper presented at the 85th International Meeting of the Psychometric Society.Bezirhan, U., von Davier, M., & Grabovsky, I. (2021). Modeling item revisit behavior: the hierarchical speed–accuracy–revisits model. Educational and Psychological Measurement., 81(2), 363–387. Wang, C., Xu, G., & Shang, Z. (2018). A two-stage approach to differentiating normal and aberrant behavior in computer based testing. Psychometrika, 83(1), 223–254. The Master left UNIT a parting gift – something alien and deadly. The Wirrn have come to Earth, and now they are free…

Milia, L. D. (2007). Benefiting from multiple−choice exams: The positive impact of answer switching. Educational Psychology, 27, 607–615. Hastings, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, 57, 97–109. Entink, R. K., Fox, J. P., & van der Linden, W. J. (2009). A multivariate multilevel approach to the modeling of accuracy and speed of test takers. Psychometrika, 74(1), 21. Geiger, M. A. (1991). Changing multiple−choice answers: A validation and extension. College Student Journal, 25, 181–186.

McMorris, R. F., DeMers, L. P., & Schwarz, S. P. (1987). Attitudes, behaviors, and reasons for changing responses following answer−changing instruction. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(2), 131–143. Vista, A., Care, E., & Awwal, N. (2017). Visualising and examining sequential actions as behavioural paths that can be interpreted as markers of complex behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 656–671. Gaskins, S., Dunn, L., Forte, L., Wood, F., & Riley, P. (1996). Student perceptions of changing answers on multiple−choice questions. Journal of Nursing Education, 35, 88–90.