276°
Posted 20 hours ago

Bad Gays: A Homosexual History

£10£20.00Clearance
ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
ZTS2023
Joined in 2023
82
63

About this deal

On July 22, 2017, Australia's The Daily Telegraph reported that several studios had expressed interest in adapting the series into a film. [1] In March 2018, Variety reported that DreamWorks Animation would develop a film based on the book series, with Etan Cohen writing the screenplay. [2] [3] [4] The following year, in October, it was reported that the film would be directed by Pierre Perifel in his feature directorial debut. [5] The film was described as having "a similar twist on the heist genre that Shrek did on fairy tales, and what Kung Fu Panda did for the kung fu genre". [5] The crew worked remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. [6] Gay liberation is an idea about a transformative, actually revolutionary sexual politics, an alliance with other people, places, and movements—while gay rights are these specific legal rights that we have now received in many countries. Those are two different projects. One succeeded, one failed. We are not particularly satisfied with the successes of gay rights. We are not satisfied with the centrism and quietism of the official version of the gay movement, which too often refuses to be in a real, meaningful alliance and solidarity with other marginalised people. And there are all kinds of cultural and interpersonal dysfunctions that come out of this as well as the political ones. Kroll, Justin (March 9, 2018). "Etan Cohen and DreamWorks Animation Developing 'Bad Guys' Film Adaptation (EXCLUSIVE)". Variety. Archived from the original on December 20, 2019 . Retrieved December 13, 2019. Abe – A bat who is a part of an intergalactic team called The Others. He always speaks the truth but he can't help it. Was Boas perfect? No. Was the anthology done by him and others flawed? Of course. But the very tools he developed to study other cultures were also used to show the flaws in his work and develop new ways (clearly it has escaped the author's notice that a definition of any scientific theory is that it is disprovable). But Boas and Mead were dedicated to finding the truth. That they failed in many ways is true but that doesn't make a person bad.

This book is about the gays that the queer community does not really want to claim as part of its own because they were "evil or complicated" or both. The authors use the term "bad gays" as an umbrella but know its imperfect.Too many popular histories seek to establish heroes, pioneers and martyrs but as Huw Lemmey and Ben Miller argue, the past is filled with queer people whose sexualities and/or dastardly deeds have been overlooked. We all remember Oscar Wilde, but who speaks for Bosie? What about those 'bad gays' whose un-exemplary lives reveals more than we might expect? A dark gray cell indicates that the character was not on the property or that the character's presence on the property has yet to be announced. I do not think, however, the book did a good enough job bringing each chapter into the whole. It felt really disconnected, and it didn't do enough to justify its focus on these bad white queers by tracing their ideas and contributions to culture and the conversation to our modern conceptions of queerness, in relation to women, those outside the gender binary, non-white and non-Western queers. There needed to be more connecting threads between chapters and to the point of the book as a whole. Start the series and plan a family movie night, so your reader can watch the books come to life in the hilarious movie adaptation, The Bad Guys. When thinking of queer historical figures, certain people come to mind: activists like Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera; writers like Virginia Woolf, Oscar Wilde, and James Baldwin; artists and performers like Frieda Kahlo and Josephine Baker. But what about the queers from the wrong side of history? Why doesn’t the queer community claim them too? If sexuality is central to how we understand the lives and accomplishments of our beloved queer icons, why not the antiheroes as well?

Sorry, but this "homosexual history" entails a bizarre look at just over a dozen "bad gays" from the perspective of modern bad gay writers. Most of the book is based on hearsay (which means some of it is unsubstantiated and therefore must be considered fiction) and the authors admit that there isn't specific evidence that some of the people included even were homosexual. I'd even add that not all named were that "bad." Lawrence of Arabia seems a good example of all those problems. From the cover alone, I was excited to read this book. I've read quite a bit of queer nonfiction; however, most of them have centered queer people in the United States of America. I was glad to see that this book took a more global approach to its subject matter. This has to be one of the worst books I have come across, I won't say written because it's origins as a collection of pod casts is abundantly clear in its appalling prose, there is a difference between spoken and written prose! You can't transcribe the spoken word and reproduce it! I also won't say read because after reading four of the chapters/essays/segments I was having problem restraining myself from physically assaulting the book and as I was reading a library copy I didn't feel right doing so - though I was tempted. I thought this was a fascinating read, it showed such a different side to queer culture and a side that I think it is vitally important we remember now as we draw ever closer to fascism. You can watch me talk about all the books I read in February as I set up my reading journal here: https://youtu.be/NY7bgSmoggMThat’s a really good question. I wouldn’t describe the book as true crime. I think that the darkest and most depraved form of consumption of heroic narrative comes from the elision of human complexity. Even people who are, politically, and in terms of their activist work, genuine heroes, like Sylvia Rivera and Marsha P. Johnson, when we leave out the ways in which they are complex human beings and not the kinds of people that society would understand as revolutionary, we miss part of what is so important about what they did and who they were fighting for. The historical perspective is fascinating, and the bits of salty gay humor sprinkled throughout liven the proceedings considerably. Booklist It is not always so easy, especially when subjects are marked by whiteness and other forms of power and privilege, to neatly separate the good from the bad, the right from the wrong. The answer, though, is not to simply stan our heroes and shush up about their flaws and faults; rather, it’s to understand how people have made and been made by history, how and why they have failed, and how and why we might succeed.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment