Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Of course, many encyclopedists are uncomfortable with the idea of pedophiles contributing to the encyclopedia ... just as they are probably uncomfortable with the idea of meth dealers or terrorists contributing. Working with people you despise is not so much fun. However, the fact is that if we want Wikipedia to be able to cover infamous crime, we're going to need contributors who are familiar with it. If law enforcement don't provide the details, insiders probably will.
According to international laws, we do not publish, have, or know where you can get sets or videos of any of LS Studios younger models. LS Land 29 – Summertime – Set 06. Is 14-year-old model too young to wear sheer clothing? The "new face" of fashion empire Christian Dior is causing controversy for appearing in sheer attire despite being only 14 years old. International supermodel Luciana Curtis talked with CBSN about her own experience as a teenager on the runway. Pornography studio operated out of Kharkiv under disguise of a children modeling agency]. rusawm.com (in Russian). 8 December 2004. Archived from the original on 10 January 2008 . Retrieved 5 February 2006. Get the latest photography news straight to your inbox by signing up to our newsletter. Newsletter SignupHere is my dilemma: I believe it would be "easily verifiable by any reasonable adult without specialist knowledge" that LS photography is high quality and that the girls are always very happy. But who would dare say that they had verified such claims by looking at LS content? Laat uw merk op authentieke wijze groeien door uw merkcontent te delen met de makers van het internet. Kom meer te weten
Ok. Let's make it clear. I agree with FloNight. There is no verifiable source for any informations about "LS Studio". The only information we have is about a child porn ring shutted down in Ukraine. Unless somebody can provide verifiable and reliable source for this studio work, this article has not his place in Wikipedia. I agree for a AfD as WP:V and WP:RS. -- Sam67fr 20:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC) These arguments are valid. None of the referenced articles mention LS Studio by name. And since the actual verifiable output of LS Studio is possibly illegal to verify, it seems that as far as Wikipedia is concerned, LS Studio did not exist. This is unfortunate, because regardless of the controversial nature of LS Studio, it did exist.An Insight into Child Porn". WikiLeaks. February 2002. Archived from the original on 10 February 2011 . Retrieved 20 February 2011. LS Dreams had girls doing everyday activities, but LS Magazine had a definite raunchy side. There was a lot of talk about this set, particularly the blonde girl who definitely had a great time. Most of the issue is artistic, however. was an online subscription service and photography studio that created hundreds of thousands of photographic images (and hundreds of videos) of young teen and prepubescent girls, and sold them via the Internet from 2001 to August 2004. During that time, they produced approximately 80 issues or collections, such as LS-Land, LS-Stars, LS-Barbie, LS-Flash, LS-Girls and LS-Fantasy..." This is a list of pornographic magazines (sometimes called erotic magazines or adult magazines) — magazines that contain content of a sexual nature and are typically considered to be pornography. Please do not reinsert it. Ah, the Wikimedia Foundation is also getting a lot of complaints about it. David.Monniaux 07:34, 14 February 2006 (UTC) Thanks for your attention to this article. Some observations:
Gay pornography includes magazines, sometimes known as adult magazines or gay sex magazines, that contain content of a sexual nature, typically regarded as pornography, that relates to men having sex with men. I want to press pause, stop the show. I want to tell them, “ You are only 12; there’s plenty of time and, frankly, the hair, the nails, the make-up, it’s a burden. Why carry it so early?” Third, editorial work in Wiki falls to those who are willing to do the research and report on it. It's a volunteer job. If you don't want to do the job and review the sources, then you should edit something else. You can't dispute facts simply because you don't want to visit the library and look them up, or because your library doesn't have the right books, or won't let you look at them. Let somebody do it who can. 194.177.100.34 19:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Mums say they boost self-esteem. Critics say they sexualise kids. We visit the bling-filled frontline of children's beauty pageants.
Vulcan (UK), made famous in a High Court test case by serial killer Dennis Nilsen [1] (out of print), Edited by David Weston until Nigel Hatton took over in the mid 80's, published by Millivres Ltd, originally based in Camden Town, London (and the original producers of Gay Times Magazine - formerly known as Gay Reporter). The magazine sells like crazy. Some explicit close ups, but doesn't really set off alarm bells until
Great Deal 
New Comment