AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Processor (12C/24T, 70MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz Max Boost)

Product Information

Platform pricing comes into play when you're making a purchasing decision, so here’s a pricing breakdown for Z790 vs X670E motherboards, along with the B650 vs B660 comparisons.

Finally, intel seems to have used the same core design to bin the different skus. Meaning all the chips have space for the igpu and avx512. For the lower skus, they fused off cores, and for the f skus, they fused off the igpu. Rather than having just one core design, especially one with space for an igpu, why didn’t Intel have an additional cypress cove core design without the igpu so that it could have added more cores? Many enthusiasts don’t need a chip with an igpu as they have a dedicated gpu. Ryzen 5000 chips don’t have an igpu and yet the 5900x and 5950x destroy intel. Not sure why they didn’t put the space they had to better use. How much of a concern this is for you depends on how concerned you are with keeping up with the latest technology. All Intel i9 CPUs are incredibly powerful and so are unlikely to be outdated anytime soon, meaning that for many gamers this won’t be a major issue. Though the future-proofing Ryzen 9 brings will put some people’s minds more at ease. Ryzen 9 vs Intel i9 – Price Based purely on core and thread count, then, the Ryzen 9 3900X is a likely better choice than the Core i9-9900K for 3D animation work, video editing, and other workflows dependent on a chip's core count. Intel uses a Thread Director to coordinate between these cores, ensuring processing tasks are distributed in the most sensible way. This means that i9 processors can achieve incredibly high speeds while maintaining good overall efficiency.We’re able to analyze the two CPUs and their behavior on benchmarks, workloads, and games, but we’re also discussing the efficiency of the two platforms and the differences in thermals between the two in demanding loads. On the other hand, the Intel Core i9-12900H processor is a major update of the previous Intel platforms, now a hybrid design with 6 Performance Cores and 8 Efficiency Cores, built on Intel’s 7 Enhanced SuperFin process. The E Cores add up to the performance of the P Cores in demanding loads, while also allowing for efficiency on battery use. As you’ll see from our tests, they make a noticeable difference in sustained demanding CPU loads, but the efficiency on battery use varies greatly between the different implementations, most likely due to the differences in software on each model.

That has an effect, though — the 7950X chip has a 170W TDP rating and a max power draw of 230W, the highest power consumption of any Ryzen chip yet.It's also much higher than the previous-gen Ryzen 9 5950X's 105W TDP rating. As we see with Intel's chip, the 7950X is designed to use the full thermal headroom available to deliver more performance. However, the 7950X has a lower 95C thermal limit, so it will frequently operate at 95C while under heavy load. MORE FROM FORBES Intel Announces 11th Gen Core i9-11900K, i7-11700K And i5-11600K Desktop CPU Details And Pricing By Antony Leather

The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X really shows what it’s made of when it comes to multi-threaded workloads. For instance, in both Geekbench and Cinebench R15, the 12-core processor scored a whopping 44,160 and 3,097, respectively. Compared to the Intel Core i9-9900K, which scores 33,173 and 1,873 in the same tests, it’s a night and day difference. For about the same price point, the Ryzen 9 3900X is between 25%-40% faster than the Intel Core i9-9900K in multi-threaded loads.

Here is a comprehensive FPS comparison chart comparing gameplay at the same graphic setting using the same GPU i.e. Nvidia RTX 4090. The external thermal readings are very similar between the two models, so I’ve only included a reading of the Intel model below. This is significant though and means that if you want the most powerful CPU available Ryzen 9 is where you need to look. Benchmark data from AMD shows the 7950X3D performing, on average, around 10% faster than the i9 13900K.

Core i9-12900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: Productivity Performance

Before we get to talk about benchmarks and performance results, I wanted to touch on the fact that Intel CPU is built on a 10 nm lithography and AMD on a 7 nm technology. This can be misleading because you cannot directly compare the technologies used by Intel and TSMC (which makes the AMD processors). In general, though, Intel’s 11thn gen Core i9 processors tend to require more power than AMD’s R9s for peak performance, and are also less efficient with daily use, something to consider if you plan to use your potential laptop unplugged more than occasionally. Compared to AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X, the Intel Core i9-13900K features more physical cores and threads. Compared to AMD’s 16, there are a total of 24. It’s interesting to note that despite AMD using the old processor core design and Intel using a new hybrid core design, the number of threads is the same. Admin said:We put the Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 9 7950X through a six-round fight to see who comes out on top. There is one additional downside to this move, though, which is that the core count has fallen from a maximum of 10 with Comet Lake and its Core i9-10900K, to just eight with the Core i9-11900K flagship this time. This means that AMD will still retain an advantage in multi-threaded workloads with its Ryzen 9 5900X with 12 cores and Ryzen 9 5950X with 16 cores and leaves Intel with only an aging high-end desktop line-up of 10th-Gen CPUs to compete at the high-end. TIE: Intel Core i9-12900K wins on new features and added flexibility, AMD Ryzen 9 5950X wins on cost of adoption