Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Feeling cheeky? ‘Oi’ is a fun and plump serif display font (a font designed for being used in large sizes). It pays homage to grotesque slab serifs from the mid–19th century such as Caslon Ionic. Its name, ‘oi’ is an abrupt and cheeky call to attention, as Google Fonts notes, mirroring its unapologetic attention-seeking character. Statement fonts with tight kerning, like Oi, are best use sparingly, paired with a more basic font for body text. Designed by Kostas Bartsokas, they deem it a ‘clarendonesque on steroids’. Read more about the story of Oi. Rowdies Pre 1989 and Post 1989 • The legal regime on anticipation and novelty may be delimited to two time frames, i.e, the law on pre-October 1, 1989 applications and the law on post-October 1, 1989 applications. • For applications in the former period, no such patent will be valid if the subject matter of the alleged invention had been described in any publication printedin Canada or in any other country more than 2 years before the actual filing date. Energy Absorption case.
Slides designed to hold samples in place for examination with a microscope; available in glass, plastic, and quartz; also includes products for preparing, staining, storing, and transporting slides. Define Your Objective: Determine the purpose of your presentation and identify the main message or key points you want to convey
Rowdies
Methods of Anticipation • An alleged invention may fail the test of novelty on the following grounds: • 1. anticipation by verbal disclosure or description; • 2. anticipation by public show or exhibition; • 3. anticipation by the existence of a prior patent or publication. Each one of these presentation themes can be adapted to match your business, school, nonprofit and other needs so that you can create something perfect for your goals and objectives. Create your free account to start customizing with our drag-and-drop presentation maker.
Anticipation • Thus, an invention is said to have been anticipated if prior to the filing of the application, another patent, document and/or reliable oral information had previously described, embodied or put in public use the alleged invention. • See Pfizer v. Apotex Date of Invention v. Anticipation • Once the date of invention is settled, the next task is to determine whether what the alleged invention teaches had already been anticipated by information or previous inventions already known to persons “skilled” in the relevant “art” to which the alleged invention pertains. • The terms “prior art” and “public domain” are different. In patent law, prior art refers to that body of knowledge in the specific field in issue ordinarily known and available to the average person working in that relevant and specific field of knowledge pertinent to the alleged invention. • Prior art is thus field-specific and narrower than information in the public domain. • Where the “new” teachings offered by the “invention” has been already taught by prior art, the alleged invention is said to have been ANTICIPATED.Canva’s slideshow maker is built for everyone. No experience needed. You can create free slideshows from templates themed for vacations, Christmas videos , business, family, or for fun. Our library is always updated with fresh template styles and layouts. Explore our huge library of design elements
Creating an intriguing 5-minute presentation may be challenging due to the time constraint. Yet, you can deliver an impactful and engaging presentation with a focused approach and attention to detail. Anticipation Post October 1989 • (ii) the filing date of the previously regularly filed application is before the claim date of the pending application, • (iii) the filing date of the co-pending application is within twelve months after the filing date of the previously regularly filed application, and • (iv) the applicant has, in respect of the co-pending application, made a request for priority on the basis of the previously regularly filed application.Priority of Claim Date • S. 28 (2)(2) provides that: • In the circumstances described in paragraphs (1)(a) to (c), the claim date is the filing date of the previously regularly filed application. • S. 28 (1), the filing date of an application is the date on which the Comm’r receives the documents, information and FEES prescribed for the purposes of this section or, if they are received on different dates, the last date. Syne Mono, like all these next fonts, may be distracting or too unique for some presentations, but there are quirkier fonts we thought to highlight to showcase an interesting variety. Canwell, cont’d • On December 10, 1987, the respondents' predecessor commenced commercial sales of a sweetening composition sold under the designation W-3053. W-3053 was the reaction product of MEA and formaldehyde and contained triazine. • There was no evidence that the composition of W-3053 or its starting materials were disclosed to customers. Novelty Under the Patent Act • …D) the applicant, or someone deriving knowledge from the applicant has, more than one year before the effective filing date, disclosed the invention in such a manner as it became available to the public. • The first two requirements clearly create a first to file system in Canada. In rare cases where 2 or more applicants, filed on the same day, or on same convention dates, all the applicants will get a patent.
MuseoModerno is a contemporary sans serif typeface, originally designed for the new identity of the Museum of Modern Art of Buenos Aires by Marcela Romero, Héctor Gatti, Pablo Cosgaya and the Omnibus-Type Team. This font is particularly fun. Thanks to its fluid and geometric lettering, MuseoModerno has lots of character. We think that pairing a heavier and lighter weight of will look fantastic. Strongly branded for the Museum of Modern Art of Buenos Aires, this font would be an excellent choice for a graphic presentation relating to contemporary art and design, but perhaps not for a company looking to find its own unique identity. Anticipation by Publication • “To constitute a prior publication, the information contained in the document must be EQUAL to that given by the patent and show EVERYTHING that is ESSENTIAL to it so that a workman of ORDINARY SKILL in the RELEVANT art would at once have perceived, understood and been able practically to apply the invention without the necessity of further experiment.” Thorson, J, in Ernest Scragg at 71; Bayer v. Apotex Legal Characteristics of Anticipation • In the much-cited case of Reeves Bros, the court held that a valid anticipation must comprise of the following elements: 1. Give an exact description; 2. Give directions which will inevitably result in something within the claims; Consistent structure: Use consistent formatting, such as font styles, colors, and alignment, throughout the presentation.Ready to get started with creating your presentation? Choose from any of these 51 presentation slides, or browse Visme’s complete template library to find the perfect match for creating your own presentation.
Great Deal 
New Comment