276°
Posted 20 hours ago

Story of the Loch Ness Monster

£9.9£99Clearance
ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
ZTS2023
Joined in 2023
82
63

About this deal

One idea is that this modification was done by a journalist who borrowed at least one of the photos before returning it to Robert Rines. When asked, Rines couldn’t say when, or whether, this happened. And it probably didn’t, since Rines sent Raynor a clean-edged (as in: retouched) version in October 1972: that is, before any journalists had had access to it. The retouching had been done at AAS. All of this was known by the mid-80s, yet the clean-edged versions continued to be used, and promoted as original (albeit ‘computer enhanced’) all the way up to 2007 at least (when Rines used one of them on the cover of his expedition literature).

Books on the Loch Ness Monster 3: The Man Who Filmed Nessie: Tim Dinsdale and the Enigma of Loch Ness However, they eventually agreed. I went up into their loft and selected six reels, all containing incredible ­footage. The target was Maurice Burton. I think i can safely say the target was hit. Final point and overall reply rejected.Unfortunately, closing ranks does nothing for critical thinking and that problem continues today when you see sceptical forums which are more dedicated to bashing " believers" than critiquing the barmiest of arguments that lightweight sceptics post. Self regulation appears not to work in these instances. It was then that I decided to study the JARIC report to find out exactly what they had said to substantiate the film and was surprised to find nothing. In fact if anyone studies the report with an open mind it actually points to the object being filmed as a small fishing boat filmed under bad light conditions.

The proprietor of the Foyers Hotel agreed to help Dinsdale by using one of his boats, and this was filmed near where he saw the creature and where it finally travelled parallel to the shore. Looking at the rainfall for June 1960 (when Burton was there), the figure was 78.5mm. That gives a rainfall increase of 70.6mm. Comparing this with other monthly differentials makes it the 41st highest climb in rainfall out of 1000+ data points. That would suggest that Mr. O 'Connor's camp fire was going to be submerged. Shine, A. 1984. A very strange fish? In Brookesmith, P. (ed) 66. Macdonald & Co, London, pp. 66-70.

Photographs of the Loch Ness Monster

I believe that on his first visit to the loch Mr Dinsdale saw an object in the water he did not recognise instantly for what it was and because the film, when developed, did not show an easily recognisable object, this film that has been given as the evidence for the last 39 years, really only shows that it is just an ordinary object filmed under bad light conditions. Klein, M., and Finkelstein, C., 1976. Sonar serendipity in Loch Ness. Technology Review, 79(2), 44–57.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment