Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy

Product Information

I wonder if that is his way of goading the reader to refer to his other work, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy.

Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy: Blackburn

This seems promising, although unlikely to satisfy Street, who demands an explanation for why we manage to track the normative truth as such, and doesn't allow for appeals to substantive normative commitments (e.After reading most of the God chapter I can tell you that so far I have learned nothing interesting.

Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy eBook Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy eBook

A helpful and/or enlightening book that is extremely well rounded, has many strengths and no shortcomings worth mentioning. We'd also be completely missing the point of their use of 'fat↓', it would seem -- failing to account for the 'special take' on the world that is involved in using the term. This, according to me, is a much better approach for an introductory book because these are themes we all think about or have thought about to different degrees; it's much easier to draw the reader into the daunting world of philosophy this way.Philosophical thinking is a crucial skill that needs to be more widely taught than it currently is, especially to students of science and engineering because it teaches you how to think and not what to think. This debate has centered on realism, or the view that what we say is validated by the way things stand in the world, and a variety of oppositions to it. The author relates Berkeley’s views to those recently expressed by Bill Brewer and attempts to isolate the crucial difference between Berkeley and schopenhauer. But at the end of the chapter, the restless spirit of reflection will cause us to look at that view as well. To quote page 151: "To jump the gun a little, I am going to present a fair number of reasons against supposing that anything recognizable as religious belief is true.

Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy by Simon Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy by Simon

So (3) a realistic materialist must hold that consciousness is a wholly physical phenomenon, and that at least some arrangements of matter are conscious or constitute consciousness. And at the same time, he showed how meta-ethics thus enriched could become an area of inquiry critical for understanding meaning, mind, and modality more generally. During a hallucination it may not be possible for me to distinguish my experience from genuine perception. Indeed, from moral dilemmas about abortion and euthanasia, to our obsession with personal rights, to our longing for a sense of meaning in life, our everyday struggles are rife with ethical issues, whether we notice it or not. He introduces the reader to the philosophy of language and how there are implications hidden in words like 'but'.Many illustrative examples, presenting the ideas rather than famous philosophers or brands of philosophy directly. In this chapter I first encountered the belief that reducing people to predetermined and conditioned factors objectivies them, taking away their humanity. So, that whole chapter is devoted to semi-dismissing some of the weaker arguments FOR the existence of God.

Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy : Blackburn

I think all of these reasons make this book a rather dull reading for those that aren't deeply interested in philosophy. Although it's titled as an 'introduction' to Philosophy, Simon Blackwell's widely acclaimed Think, is a deceptively mighty beast of a book, and it covers a huge amount of ground without dumbing anything down. Think dispels this myth and offers a springboard for all those who want to learn how the basic techniques of thinking shape our virtually every aspect of our existence. The editors provide a substantial introduction, in which they look at how the debates relate to further issues, such as the Liar paradox and formal truth theories. Hume's most ingenious argument rejecting testimony of miracles is presented: He simply says that it is always more probably that someone made up the story than that the miracle happened.The argument runs like this-1) There are variations in our perception 2)Our perception varies without corresponding changes in the physical object we perceive (e. Beebee ("Causation, Projection, Inference, and Agency") explores "the prospects of a projectivist account of causation of the kind that Hume (thus interpreted) and, apparently, Blackburn endorse" (p. When hallucinating i am appearing to perceive something when in reality there is nothing there at all. So the middle-ground answer reminds us that reflection is continuous with practice, and our practice can go worse or better according to the value of our reflections.